Header
 

April 11, 2008

For centuries, scientists have investigated how eggs and sperm (gametes) develop in mammals.  Most of this work has been in non-human animals, particularly the mouse.  The capacity to grow human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) in vitro* will facilitate research on human egg and sperm development.  As a result, the day is now foreseen when it will be possible to derive eggs and sperm from PSCs in the laboratory.  This line of research raises social and ethical issues that may be viewed differently in different cultures.  The goal of this document is to inform public discussion about the state of the science and its potential social implications and to make recommendations about policy and practice.

State of the Science

  1. PSC-derived gamete research has considerable scientific value and potential both for understanding basic mechanisms of gamete biology and overcoming clinical problems.
    1. Human PSCs have proven to give rise in vitro to cells with characteristics of the earliest stages of germ cells (progenitors of eggs and sperm).
    2. These cells are being used to explore important scientific questions such as the role of specific genes in early germ cell development.
    3. No method has yet been described that produces human gametes capable of fertilization in vitro from a PSC.
    4. Some steps along the developmental pathway of PSC-derived gametes have been achieved in other species in vitro.
    5. Some steps along the developmental pathway of human germ cells that originated in vivo have been achieved in vitro.
    6. These steps are being used to explore important scientific questions including the interaction between germ cells and supporting somatic cells.
  2. Based on published data and theoretical considerations, it is probable that human eggs and sperm will be derived partly or entirely in vitro from PSCs.  The pace of scientific progress is difficult to predict. Unanticipated findings can either accelerate or slow the pace of progress.  With this caveat, the derivation of human eggs and sperm in vitro from PSCs, in whole or at least in part, is anticipated within 5 to 15 years.

    However, it should be noted that:
    1. It is likely to be very difficult to derive eggs that could be used for reproduction from XY (chromosomally male) cells.
    2. There are biological and technical reasons that will make it even more difficult, or even impossible, to derive sperm that could be used for reproduction from XX (chromosomally female) cells.
  3. Tests exist to measure some aspects of the viability and functionality of gametes.  These tests can be applied to cells derived from PSCs. In order to determine whether a method for derivation is producing functional gametes, however, it is necessary to establish the capacity of these cells for fertilization and early embryogenesis**.
  4. Similar research involving other mammalian species, including those important to agriculture, is also being conducted.  The results from all lines of research will inform one another.   

Potential Social Implications

  1. PSC-derived gamete research could lead to the development of additional options for assisted human reproduction.
  2. Advances in PSC-derived gamete research are likely to result in applications directed towards ends for which there will be substantial societal agreement. For example, PSC-derived gamete research will generate knowledge that should facilitate the development of new ways to prevent and treat infertility, genetic disease, and some cancers, including germ cell cancers.
  3. Until the validity and reliability of techniques for deriving gametes from PSCs have been established, the capacity for fertilization will need to be tested, and resulting embryos grown to at least the blastocyst stage (made up of about 100 cells), which is the earliest at which reasonable estimates about functionality can be determined. This work will involve the deliberate generation of embryos in vitro solely for research purposes. 
  4. Currently, the availability of eggs and embryos for research and assisted reproduction requires eggs from women, with attendant burdens and risks for women from whom eggs are obtained.  Once PSC-derived gamete research produces gametes capable of fertilization, the need to obtain eggs from women could be reduced. Additionally, greater numbers of embryos may be produced for research and potentially for human reproduction.
  5. Advances in PSC-derived gamete research may facilitate applications directed towards ends that will be socially controversial, such as germ line genetic modification for the correction of disease mutations, introduction of disease resistance, other forms of biological enhancement, increased possibilities for embryo selection or the birth of genetic offspring of same-sex parents (but, see State of the Science, 2a and 2b).
  6. Many of the scientific advances anticipated from PSC-derived gametes will be gained not by research on embryos, but by research solely on gametes developing in vitro; for example, the role of specific genes in germ cell development, the origins of chromosome abnormalities, and the development of fertility treatment for people with gonadal injury or disease.

Recommendations

  1. PSC-derived gamete research must conform to ethical principles and norms of practice and comply with existing oversight mechanisms.  As this research progresses, researchers, research institutions and funders must consider whether these mechanisms remain sufficiently robust to ensure the highest standards for ethical integrity. Specific attention should be paid to protecting the rights and interests of the human sources of cells from which gametes are obtained, including a requirement to obtain specific consent before any PSC-derived gametes are used for reproduction.
  2. Journal editors should also support and promote high standards for ethical integrity in PSC-derived gamete research.  For example, on request from editors, authors should provide assurance of adherence to local policy, including appropriate approval by ethics review committees.
  3. Oversight structures must be in place prior to any attempts to use PSC-derived gametes in human reproduction. Oversight should include the development of appropriate standards for preclinical data. Initial attempts should be conducted only in the context of research. In addition, the health and well-being of women participants, their developing fetuses, and pregnancy outcomes should be monitored carefully. The health and well-being of children born should also be monitored in long-term follow-up studies.
  4. In considering policies governing the regulation of applications, a distinction should be made between objections that are based on technical or safety concerns and objections that reflect other moral considerations.  Technical and safety concerns have the potential to be resolved over time by additional scientific research and advances, while other moral considerations may continue to be the focus of public debate. 
  5. Public policies carry great power to facilitate or restrict scientific exploration in the area of PSC-derived gamete research. Policy makers should be circumspect when regulating science. When enacted, policies governing science nationally and internationally ought to be flexible, so as to accommodate the rapidity of scientific advance as well as changes of social values.
  6. Societies have the authority to regulate science, and scientists have a responsibility to obey the law. However:
    1. Policy makers should refrain from interfering with scientific inquiry unless there is substantial justification for doing so that reaches beyond disagreements based solely on divergent moral convictions. Any interference with scientific inquiry should be derived from reasonable concerns about demonstrable risks of harm to persons, societal institutions, or society as a whole.
    2. In the case of PSC-derived gametes, as with all science, it is important to target policy specifically to those dimensions of the research or its applications that have proved to be unacceptable, and that these policies be proportionate to the magnitude of what is morally at stake.
  7. We encourage informed public debate amongst scientists, policy makers and the public to ensure that scientific data and societal values are adequately and accurately represented in the development of policies for controversial applications of PSC-derived gametes.···

Steering Committee

Peter J Donovan, PhD
Professor, Biological Chemistry,
Developmental & Cell Biology,
University of California - Irvine
2054 Hewitt Hall
Irvine, CA 92697
Phone: 949 824 3691
Fax: 949 824 6388
Email: pdonovan@uci.edu

Ruth Faden, PhD, MPH
Philip Franklin Wagley Professor of Biomedical Ethics
Executive Director, Berman Institute of Bioethics
Professor, Department of Health Policy & Management , School of Public Health
Professor, Department of Medicine
The Johns Hopkins University
624 North Broadway, Room 352 
Baltimore, MD  21205-1996 
Phone: 410 955 3018
Fax: 410 614 9567
Email: rfaden@jhsph.edu

John Harris, FMedSci, BA, DPhil
Lord Alliance Professor of Bioethics,
Institute for Science, Ethics and Innovation,
School of Law, University of Manchester
Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9PL
Phone: +44 161 275 3473
Fax: +44 161 275 7704
Email: john.harris@manchester.ac.uk

Robin Lovell-Badge, PhD, FMedSci, FRS
Head, Division of Developmental Genetics, MRC National Institute for Medical Research
Division of Developmental Genetics, MRC National Institute for Medical Research
The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK
Phone: +44 020 8816 2126
Email: rlovell@nimr.mrc.ac.uk

Debra JH Mathews, PhD, MA
Assistant Director for Science Programs, Berman Institute of Bioethics,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics
The Johns Hopkins University
100 North Charles Street, Suite 740
Baltimore, MD 21201
Phone: 410 516 8602
Fax: 410 516 8504
Email: dmathews@jhmi.edu

Julian Savulescu, BMedSci, MB, BS, MA, PhD
Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics,
Director, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
Littlegate House, St Ebbes
Oxford OX1 1P, UK
Phone: +44 1865 286888
Fax: +44 1865 286886
Email: julian.savulescu@philosophy.ox.ac.uk

 Other Members

Philip Avner, PhD
Senior Scientist - Institut Pasteur
Unit Director, Mouse Molecular Genetics Unit
Unite Genetique Moleculaire Murine
Institut Pasteur 
  
Hannah Bourne
Student, Monash University Melbourne
Oxford University
New College 

Peter Braude MA, PhD, FRCOG, FMedSci
Head of Department of Women’s Health, King’s College London
Director, Centre for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis,
Guy’s and St Thomas’ Foundation Trust, London
 
Liuhong Cai, MD, PhD
Director, Reproductive and Andrology Laboratory
Lecturer and Attending Physician
Department of Infertility  & Andrology Medicine
The 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University 
 
Sarah Chan, BSc(Hons), LLB, MA(Health Care Ethics & Law)
Research Fellow, Institute for Science, Ethics and Innovation, University of Manchester 
R Alta Charo, JD
Warren P Knowles Professor of Law & Bioethics 
University of Wisconsin Law School 
 
Amander Clark, PhD
Assistant Professor, University of California, Los Angeles
Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative 
Medicine and Stem Cell Research 
 
Natalie DeWitt, PhD
Editor at Large, Nature Reports Stem Cells
Senior Editor, Nature 
 
Ina Dobrinski, DrMedVet, MVSc, PhD 
Associate Professor of Large Animal Reproduction 
Marion Dilly and David George Jones Chair in Animal Reproduction 
Director, Center for Animal Transgenesis and Germ Cell Research, Department of Animal Biology 
School of Veterinary Medicine
University of Pennsylvania 
 
Thomas Douglas, BMedSc, MB ChB, 
Senior Scholar and DPhil Candidate (Philosophy)
Oxford University 
 
John Eppig, PhD
Senior Staff Scientist
The Jackson Laboratory   
 
Lixin Feng, PhD
Professor, Shanghai Stem Cell Institute
Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine 
 
Niels Geijsen, PhD
Assistant Professor
Harvard Medical School, Harvard University
Center for Regenerative Medicine and Technology
Massachusetts General Hospital 
  
Christer Höög, PhD
Professor, Chairman, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet

Ching-Li Hu, MD
Member, UNESCO International Bioethics Committee
Senior Adviser and Emeritus Professor, Ruijin Hospital—the Affiliated Teaching Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine;
Sr Adviser, Department of Ethics, Legal and Social Issues, Chinese Natl Human Genome Center at Shanghai;
Director of the Bioethics Committee, Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau;
Panel Member, of Intl Health, Ministry of Health Beijing
 
Ryuichi Ida, LLB, LLM
Professor of International Law, Kyoto University 
Graduate School of Law and School of Government, Japan Member, Science Council of Japan
 
Mariella Immacolato, MD
Director, Unit of Legal Medicine, Hospital of Massa and Carrara
 
S Matthew Liao, DPhil 
Deputy Director and James Martin Senior Research Fellow, Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford University
 
Reinhard Merkel, Prof, Dr
Institut für Kriminalwissenschaften
Universität Hamburg
 
Maurizio Mori, MA, PhD
Professor, Department of Philosophy
University of Turin
 
Alison Murdoch, BSc, MD, FRCOG
Head, Newcastle Fertility Centre
BioScience Centre, International Centre for Life
 
Toshiaki Noce, PhD
Mitsubishi Kagaku Institute of Life Sciences (MITILS)
 
Helen Picton, PhD
Head, Reproduction and Early Development Research Group, University of Leeds, The Light laboratories
 
Beverly Purnell, PhD
Senior Editor, Science Magazine
American Association for Advancement of Science

Alan Regenberg, MBe
Senior Research Program Coordinator
Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University
Renee Reijo Pera, PhD
Director of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research 
Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Stanford University
 
Carlos M Romeo-Casabona, Dr iur, Dr med, Dr h c mult 
Professor in Criminal Law, Director, Inter-University Chair
BBVA Foundation - Provincial Government of Biscay 
in Law and the Human Genome 
University of Deusto / University of The Basque Country 
 
Hans R Schöler, PhD
Professor, Director of the
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine 
 
Loane Skene, LLB (Hons) (Melb), LLM (Mon)
Professor of Law, Faculty of Law,
Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences
University of Melbourne
 
Davor Solter, MD, PhD
Senior Principal Investigator, Institute of Medical Biology, Biomedical Science Institutes, A*STAR, Singapore
Professor, Duke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School
 
William C Stubing
President, The Greenwall Foundation 

Jeremy Sugarman, MD, MPH, MA 
Harvey M Meyerhoff Professor of Bioethics and Medicine
Deputy Director for Medicine, Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University
 
Azim Surani, PhD, FRS, FMedSci
Mary Marshall and Arthur Walton Professor of Physiology and Reproduction
The Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, The Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, University of Cambridge
 
Giuseppe Testa, MD, PhD, MA
Assistant professor, European School of Molecular Medicine
Laboratory of Stem Cell Epigenetics
European Institute of Oncology 
 
James Turner, MD, PhD
Division of Developmental Genetics and Stem Cell Research
MRC National Institute for Medical Research 
 
Teresa K Woodruff, PhD
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology,
Northwestern University  
 
Xiaomei Zhai, MD, PhD
Executive Director, Center for Bioethics
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Professor & Director, Department of Social Sciences & Humanities


* Human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) are cells that have the capacity to develop into all the different cells in the human body. These cells have been isolated from several different sources, including early human embryos and human adult cells that have been induced in the laboratory to revert to pluripotent stem cells. In vitro is a biological term meaning outside a living organism, and is used in contrast to in vivo, meaning within a living organism.

** Throughout this document, all references to research on human embryos assume compliance with existing guidelines, for example, the prohibition on growing human embryos in vitro beyond 14 days.

··· This consensus statement is being issued in memory of Anne McLaren, who was, among many other things, a member of the Hinxton Group. She is missed.

 
about us
consensus
cs1
cs2
members
meetings
TCISR
TCISR Overview
Chatham House Rule
TCISR References
TCISR Funders
 

PSCDG

PSCDG Overview
Chatham House Rule
PSCDG References
PSCDG funders
publications
news